Jessica Lunsford is a nine year old girl who went to bed three weeks ago on the night of February 23 in a most normal manner. The next morning she was gone.
Also missing was a cherished toy of Jessica’s.
Just as soon as I hear of a child missing from their homes, often “abducted” in the middle of the night, I suspect the people in the house. Although I am certainly not alone in this suspicion.
And it DOES happen, of course, and missing children are a serious problem and the search for them should be taken seriously and quickly.
There’s rumors and speculation in abundance over this case. Plus a few things I’ve deduced from observation.
Beginning with the fact that Jessica’s father seems to be trying to make some money off of his daughter’s fate. I saw him with my own two eyes on Greta’s show telling the viewers where they should send their money. Which was a surprise to me as I had no clue how money was going to help find Jessica.
For there’s been a bevy of volunteers including search dogs, not to mention law enforcement, out looking for Jessie and this required very little money.
It turns out that Mr. Lunsford wanted viewers to send money to HIM.
Okay, so this is poor taste, perhaps. Or perhaps something more sinister.
Jessica lived in her Florida home with her Grandmother, Grandfather and her greedy father. All three of these folks took both a voice stress test and a lie detector test.
At first all media reports had Jessica’s family all passing these tests with flying colors.
Yesterday Florida officials announce that there were two “red flags” raised during Grandmother’s lie detector test.
This is an occurrence I have never witnessed before in the annals of true crime. Law enforcement rarely releases the results of lie detector tests. Recall that even the results of OJ’s lie detector test, which he failed miserably, were not released save by rumor and innuendo.
Defense attorneys will, if circumstances favor their client, release the results of lie detector tests that their client be considered innocent in the court of public opinion.
This causes me to think that there’s something very fishy about the law people up and making a formal announcement about Grandmother’s lie detector test results. Methinks it’s a red herring; a ploy to get someone, somewhere, to come forward.
That someone is described as a “person of interest”, the politically correct term for suspect, by the Florida law people.
Rumor has it that this person of interest is a friend of Jessica’s father.
The way I figure there is a reason to believe that whoever this person is has been discussed and something about the suspect gives both Jessica’s family and investigators reason to believe he could be involved with Jessica’s disappearance.
Perhaps he’s said something suspicious in the past, something that was considered innocent at the time but under current circumstances bears reconsideration. Maybe he’s mentioned how cute he thought Jessica is, how he’d like to take her home with him, who knows. But something has the Florida people sniffing hard for this guy.
They needed a way to lure him in, a way to make them think that they have the goods on him. Thus they came up with the tale that Granny failed the lie detector test.
Of course this is just speculation and only my speculation at this point. But the oddness of how this is currently happening is glaring. The lead law guy in Florida held a press conference and stated he would release the name of this “person of interest” in 48 hours.
This is damn odd.
Except that they are waiting for this fellow to turn himself in. Hoping that their red herring will scare him.
This morning, Wednesday 3/16/05, Jessie’s father held a short press conference and he claimed that he had no idea who the law people were seeking. This simply cannot be true. It’s been affirmed that the person of interest is a male. Wild rumor and common sense dictates that it has to be someone the Lunsfords know. Rumor hones it down to a friend of the father. Common sense says it has to be someone who knows Jessica in some capacity. Jessie’s father had to be lying at that press conference.
I’m beginning to suspect that the abduction of Jessica may have been a preconceived plan. It’s possible this friend of Jessica’s family is part of the plan. Which would be to arrange an abduction of Jessica, turn her disappearance into a grand public display, and solicit money to help find her.
Somehow the law people got onto the plan, I’m thinking maybe the father confessed. Now they’re trying to get the father’s friend to come forward. With Jessica, very much alive.
Yes, it’s wild speculation, the above scenario.
Based on rumors circulating the Internet, frankly. And what few details are known. Such as Jessica’s beloved stuffed animal missing, some sort of purple thing. Beloved toys given to abducted children is an act of love, generally done by caring people, not strangers stealing children deep in the night.
One more speculation. Jessica had been to a church function earlier in the evening before she went missing. It’s possible that Grandmother didn’t tuck Jessica in at all as she asserted. It’s possible that she THOUGHT Jessica was in bed but didn’t want to admit she wasn’t the perfect Grandmother she’s trying to portray. But who knows, maybe she was tired, told Jessica to go to bed, didn’t go tuck her in as she stated to look good. When Jessica disappeared she didn’t want to admit it. Not all parents or Grandparents in this case, tuck their children in bed, not every single night. Sometimes we tell them to go to bed and think that they do as instructed. Most times they do.
If this scenario is correct it would open a bevy of possibilities as to what happened to Jessica. Perhaps she snuck out the door when Grandmother wasn’t looking. Perhaps she went outside for something and someone she knew took off with her in a car. Rumor has it there’s evidence that a strange car sported Jessica off.
Like all of these true crimes in the midst of the action, there’s plenty law enforcement isn’t releasing. Somehow Jessica got home from that church function. Who brought her home? I don’t recall any information forthcoming about this. Could someone have brought her home, told her to go tell her Grandmother she was home, pretend to go to bed, then come out and we’ll drive off. Obviously this person would have to be someone Jessica knew and trusted.
I’ve seen pictures of Jessica’s room. It looks to be a room of a loved child. And Granny doesn’t strike me as one who would hurt Jessica. If red flags were indeed raised during her lie tests I’m guessing it was because of some little but important detail Grandmother didn’t reveal in her guilt over what happened.
The truth or some facsimile will soon come out. For now it’s almost a one hundred percent possibility that this abduction was NOT done by strangers.
