|Such language from a duck so young!|
So I watched the debates so far.
Last night had some major hallmarks, especially that awful, awful Candy Crowley.
First thing she defends Obama, says he most certainly did mention an "act of terror" in the Rose Garden the day after the Benghazi attack.
Well he did but it was a reference to "terror acts" in general, NOT the Libya matter. But mighty Candy Crowley, WHO SHOULD BE FIRED….I dunno, some boobaloob must a told her that Obamaer mentioned act of terror and SHE BELIEVED IT!
So on national TV she supports this mighty lie and what a perfect example of journalistic laziness and bias.
Saw Bagdad Gibbs on TV this morning and he's smirking and snorting over the "terror" mention cause this administration got what it wanted. It wanted some journalist to verify that Obamer did mention terror after the Libya attack and that's it…..just words but they mis-use words all the time. With a little help from journalistic friends, that is.
Now about that VP debate….
Come on, Biden behaved terrible.
I've always said Joe Biden has a Cheshire cat grin. He sure proved it during his awful behavior as he smiled stupidly, groaned, rolled eyes and in general displayed the manners of a pole cat.
Biden didn't do too bad in the debate although every single word he said was a lie. But, lie or not, Biden did manage to avoid all the gaffes for which he is well known.
I must imagine that debate prep for Biden was hours of having him repeat lies over and over, loudly, insert silly cheshire cat grin here, roll eyes, interrupt Ryan, rudely, insert more lies.
I thought Ryan's story of his then ultra-sound daughter and his nickname of Bean to be just, eh, a little too politically self-serving. But it was a true story, I've no doubt, and I've no doubt Ryan meant would he said about abortion.
I have a little pride in that the Republican party, for once, didn't run crying and screaming from the subject, always fearful that the liberal baby-killers in this country would condemn them as the party that would keep women barefoot and pregnant.
Of course Ryan did add the caveat that he'd never oppose abortion due to incest or rape.
And there's the rub. If, in some mythical future, I'm a female desirous of an abortion due to an unplanned pregnancy, and IF the only one I could get one is to claim rape or incest, well that's exactly what I'd do. When Republicans always add that caveat about abortion exceptions for rape and incest it's a bit of a dodge, an insertion to prove that they are not mean people who would make a n already victimized female bear the child of her rapist.
There's also the nightmare of the possible ads the libs would put out with a 12 year old sobbing because she's pregnant with her father's child and the Republicans won't let her have an abortion.
Throwing down the gauntlet and declaring that abortions will never be banned in cases of rape and incest is tantamount to stating that abortion will NEVER be made illegal.
Although Ryan did state, truthfully and firmly, that he did not think that 7 unelected justices should be determining such things, that this sort of serious issue is up to the majority of the people.
By me that's very fair but the libs won't like it. Planned Parenthood employs a lot of Democrats, so they must be funded by an endless stream of abortion-needy females.
No. Romney conducted himself quite well in the two debates so far. Paul Ryan did very well too.
Add this to the Obamer/Biden joke and I pray every night for God to please rid these awful people from America's helm.
America deserves better than a bunch of liars.
Hooray for Florida !
I-95 and I-75 will be jammed for the next month or so with druggies and deadbeats heading North out of Florida, because this is the first state in the union to require drug testing to receive welfare!
Hooray for Florida! In signing the new law, Republican Gov. Rick Scott said, "If Floridians want welfare, they better make sure they are drug-free."
Applicants must pay for the drug test, but are reimbursed if they test drug-free. Applicants who test positive for illicit substances, won't be eligible for the funds for a year, or until they undergo treatment. Those who fail a second time will be banned from receiving funds for three years!
Naturally, a few people are crying this is unconstitutional.
How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?
I AGREE, DO YOU?
The Part D Deductible Already Doubled This Year, Did You Notice?
A message from Blue Cross Blue Shield
Professor Emeritus John W. Hill, JD, PhD
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
Look clearly at the 2014 rate compared to the 2013 rate.
For those of you who are on Medicare, read the following. It's short, but
important and you probably haven't heard about it in the Mainstream News:
"The per person Medicare Insurance Premium will increase from the present
Monthly Fee of $96.40, rising to:
$104.20 in 2012
$120.20 in 2013
$247.00 in 2014."
These are Provisions incorporated in the Obamacare Legislation,purposely
delayed so as not to confuse the 2012 Re-Election Campaigns.
Send this to all Seniors that you know, so they will know who's throwing them under the bus.
Executive Orders Making a King. Where is Our Congress!!
Obama has the media on his side (read below) to discredit Romney any way he can .
Please read this carefully & understand what he’s doing. Taking away all control of the American people.
EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSUED…
Teddy Roosevelt 3
Others to FDR NONE
FDR 11 in 16 years
Truman 5 in 7 years
Ike 2 in 8 years
Kennedy 4 in 3 years
LBJ 4 in 5 years
Nixon 1 in 6 years
Ford 3 in 2 years
Carter 3 in 4 years
Reagan 5 in 8 years
Bush 3 in 4 years
Clinton 15 in 8 years
George W. Bush 62 in 8 years
Obama 923 in 3½ years!
If you don't get the implications you're not paying attention. How many warnings do you need?
923 Executive Orders in 40 Months!
During my lifetime, All Presidents have issued Executive Orders, for reasons that vary, some more than others.
Whenever a President issued as many as 30 Ex. Orders during a term in Office, people thought there was
something amiss. (The media excoriated George W. Bush over his “excessive use” of the privilege)
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT 923 EX. ORDERS IN ONE PART OF ONE TERM????
YES, THERE IS A REASON.
IT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL
AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE.
Even some Democrats in the House have turned on him, plus a very small number of
Democrat Senators question him.
HE SHOULD BE QUESTIONED. WHAT IS HE REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH????
DOES THIS SCARE YOU AS MUCH AS IT DOES ME?
Not really surprising that he appointed "Czars" to be in charge of everything.
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you.
....THIS IS NOT FUNNY, AND IF YOU VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN, YOU CAN EXPECT MORE!
Remember what he told Russia 's Putin: "I'll be more flexible after I'm re-elected".
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION: Obama has signed 923 Executive Orders in 40 months!
What did Congress do in those 40 months? (The House - considerable. The Senate - nothing,
not even a budget nor allowing any House bill to be considered.)
A whole new order must prevail in Wash. DC as a result of this next election!
Now look at these:
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of
transportation and control of highways and seaports.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power,
gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work
brigades under government supervision.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education
and welfare functions.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the registration of all persons. Postmaster General to
operate a national registration
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to
take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate
communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be
abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland
waterways and public storage facilities.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal
departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued
over a fifteen year period.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency
Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in
times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce
the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to
establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate
penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to
develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and
distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money
in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency.
It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President,
Congress cannot review the action for six months.
. Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to
"harmonize" U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world. This new
executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a
North American Union and a one world economic system.
Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.
The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking
for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world.
The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this
latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. economic policy.
Now federal regulators will be required to "harmonize" their work with the
Ending with a Smile